Monday, February 16, 2015

Thesis Proposal

"Response to Gov. Romney's Speech, 'Faith in America'"

Although this response paper was supposed to point-out and counter many of the fallacies Romney made in his speech, I felt that the author only managed to use up the same fallacies within their own work. They regarded how Romney's speech was tailored only to the religious in America, but made the same choice by appealing only to the non-religious in America. Either way, a portion of the population was cut out, and I think the response paper was greatly weakened by their polarized point of view. Their language was also off putting to a third-party audience, and in doing so, lead the reader to focus more on that point than the overall massage of the paper.

I do seen how this paper would be convincing to the intended audience, who might have also seen the one-sighted view of Romney's original speech. It would also work to affirm the opinions of those who did not like Romney's ideas on religion. I think he used a lot of Logos and Pathos to draw in the audience.

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Style Academy - Phrases and Clauses Exercieses

Honestly, I keep forgetting that we have to physically hand in the Style Academy reviews, and I feel really bad for it, but I will 100% do it this next time...
It's as simple as that. 

I watched the video about Phrases and Clauses, and I am going to have to say, this is one of the less-helpful videos on this site. The information given was simple and understandable, but I think it was a little to simple. I feel like they could have fit more information into it, and a bit more of a writing exercise. Maybe the difference between clauses and phrases really is that simple.

Or, maybe the reason they focused on so little within the video, is because a lot of people still struggle with the concept. I was second guessing myself on some of the exercise sentences, though came out with the right answer in the end, and I think it will help me to think about clauses and phrases when rereading my papers. 

Still, I feel the whole video can be summed up in this one screen shot, and next time I will try to pick a more in-depth one (and remember to turn it in in class...)

Exercise:
Is it a Phrase or a Clause?

"on the front porch"
-phrase (prepositional phrase)

"after the dinner party"
-phrase 

"we ate peas and carrots"
-clause (independent)

"after running to the store"
-phrase 

Thursday, February 5, 2015

Faith in America

MITT ROMNEY

Purpose: The purpose was to establish Romney's view on own religion should work in relation to the US, and to help others understand where he stands in regards to his personal religion.

Logos: I thought Romney did well to mention relevant topics in his speech, such as the threat we face from "Radical violent Islam" as well as centering it around his candidacy and how people might view it. He also used examples to appeal to those who accepted religion, but might not have sounded very logical to those who have nothing to connect with in religion. However, we also appealed to those who accepted the fundamental ideals of American, and related them back to religion.  He was also able to build his issue using quotes from reliable sources pertaining to religion.

Pathos: He was able to connect with his audience by using examples of how religion has played into our countries past. He connected the people as patriots, and pulled on their heart sting while relating to the presidents time in war, as well as his own parents past roles in the american legacy. I thought his word choice did very well to guild the reader to his conclusion, he was able to use wording that would not come across as bias or off-putting to any one audience. He connected well with those of religions beyond his own by mentioning pros of those religions, "I love the profound ceremony of the Catholic Mass, the approachability of God in the prayers of the Evangelicals, the tenderness of spirit a,ing the Pentecostals, the confident independence of the Lutherans, the ancient tradition of the Jews, unchanged through the ages, and the commitment to frequent prayer of the Muslims."

Ethos: He established credibility by being willing to share some of his religious beliefs. Also, by refusing to make it completely about his personal church, he established his political credibility. He also establishes his credibility as a leader by mentioning his past position as Governor. He established an authoritative voice by noting his understanding of other religions, and in doing so also was able to identify with difference listeners. He also established credibility by relating his view points and candidacy to past leaders, who we all could recognize.

The REAL Reflection on the OP ED

If you want to read my OP ED paper, it is written out in one of the earlier posts!

I believe one of the strongest tactics I used in my Opinion Editorial paper was pathos. I tried hard to connect with the readers emotions to help them understand my point. I shared specific examples of situations that occur on social media in an attempt to show the reader things they have done before, and how it is really effecting them. As an example, I explained how we might try to connect with a celebrity for many sorts of reasons, but then went on to explain why those reasons may not be valid. I was able to guide the reader to my point by connecting them with something they already knew.  I used language to paint pictures and metaphors that hopefully made the audience think about social media in away they had not really put into words before.

The tactic I used the least was probably logos. Being an Opinion Editorial, I did incorporate any facts, but mostly observations and description that followed a logical thought process. I made sure to flush out my points, so the audience would not think I was jumping to any conclusions. At times, I feared I may have used too much generalization, but think the reasons fit well this the intended audience. I think the issue of the paper was very relevant and easy to understand. I also think I was able to go into many different aspects of the issue to give more evidence as to why social media can be, and is in fact, a problem. 

I think I also used ethos quite well in this paper, but that may be up for debate depending on how you think about it. I tried to establish my credibility on the subject by showing that I have had some not-so positive experience with social media. However, I tried to maintain an authoritative voice by stating that I was able to see the flaws in these experiences, and use them to learn. However, some may take my “on your side” kind of writing stance as discrediting, because I am not completely separate from the problem. They may think I was too influenced by the issue to write an effective argument.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Pathos in an Article

"Why I can't Stop Reading Mormon Housewife Blogs"
by Emily Matchar

1. I thought one way Matchar conveyed pathos in her article was by the language she used. It was very fluffy - like a mom blog would be - but also sarcastic as she addressed how against-her-nature the topics were. Things like "bangs like Zooey Deschanel" and "They drink a suspicious amount of hot chocolate." She was able to connect with two audiences - both those who find these things odd and funny, and those who find them familiar. . . and still funny.

2. I felt she was also able to connect with her audience by talking about the different views of the role of a mother. She talked about the perfect-housewife view of the 50s, the pain-in-the-butt mothers of today, and how the Mormon  mothers compare to these. She was about to connect with the audience by turning us towards one life style or the other.

3. Honestly, I found this article to be intriguing, because she shifted her view around. She said that these Mormon blogs could be a bunch of smock-sceen nonsense, but she followed it up by saying that was not completely a bad thing. She was about to address difference ideas regarding her lifestyle, but end nicely by taking the positive side for the blogs.

Creating an Addiction - OP ED Final Paper


I have a facebook, snapchat, instagram, pinterest, and I just recently started a blog. (wink) Some would say that I am pretty well “plugged in” to social media.  Still, there are many sites that I have yet to venture into: twitter, youtube, tumblr, vine, to name a few. However, just browsing these few sites is enough for me to recognize a growing problem that is poisoning this generation. Social media has become far too influential on how we view ourselves, not just our friends. Yes, social media is an effective tool in our day to day lives, but I fear we have become too fixated on it for less substantial reasons. Our lives have become nothing more than our next stop on the computer. Even as I write this, my attention is caught between my laptop and the notifications popping up on my phone screen. Our generation is becoming too dependent on social media and it is severely affecting our self-esteem, as well as the way we esteem our interaction with others.

Although the power of the internet has given us the opportunity to tap into the world’s limitless knowledge and wonder, we have chosen to squander this ability by obsessing over the rich and glamorous. With this eternal wealth of information, we decide to fill our heads with every last detail of our idol’s lives. Stalking is no longer an issue, but more of a household fixation. We see no problem in creating a false, one-sided relationship with some foreign figure because we admire their talent, personality, sense of humor, or - here’s the big one - their unbelievably good looks. Simply put, man was not created to idolize man. 

That is what famous people are - human. Yes, they are funny, but so are the people you have right in front of you. I heard once, long before social media, that when you thought someone had a great personality you asked them to be your friend in real life. This is what we should be focusing on: real life. We are gaining nothing by listening to a youtuber talk to us through a screen. We seem to forget that those youtubers are also alone, staring at a screen. We have fabricated the idea that these people matter to us, that they understand us and that they are our friends, but that is the furthest thing from the truth. Our generation is starving itself of real, human interaction. We depend on the famous; they provide us with a sense of comfort requiring minimal effort on our part. They make us feel welcome with their winning personalities, and shout outs to “all my fans!” We convince ourselves of their love, and we lose sight of our value beyond their eyes. Our self-esteem becomes deeply linked to the actions of our idol.

Every human wants to feel important, we want to know we left a mark on this world. We see celebrities as the short cut to immortality - if I can only get them to notice me, maybe others will notice me, then I will be important. But we fail to examine what kind of mark that celebrity is actually forming. Will it really last? Is it really helpful? Many don’t care what kind of mark they have left, as long as other people know they are there. Much of the famous live under the philosophy of quantity over quality and, just like politicians, they make it all about what the followers want. We as fans have crafted them and build them up to be our Greek gods; without our prayers, they would cease to exist. Their mark on the world is written in pencil; their claim to fame has no substance. Their lazy example of influence has proven detrimental to our ideals. We mimic their personalities, repost theirs jokes, and resort to stealing their content just to feel popular. 

I found myself as a victim of these tactics when I decided to look up a music video my friend and I made for fun. As I looked on youtube, I found a video with the same title which turned out to be our exact video downloaded and re-uploaded by another user. While inspecting this youtuber, I found out their whole page was nothing more than the plagiarized videos of others. This girl clearly enjoyed this videos, but her main concern was how viewers would associate that entertainment with herself. Instead of crafting our own ideas to share, we seize the path that was already proven successful. We forget our own potential and creativity. We can’t believe in ourselves enough to try something new. The influence of the media-famous is proving  detrimental to our confidence.

How we view ourselves next to our peers can be more influential than the opinion of a celebrity. I was just recently introduced to the term “The Curator Affect.” A curator of a museum is charged with the duty of selecting a body of work for an exhibit. They pick only the best works that fit the image they are trying to create, and simply omit the rest. This is how many choose to handle social media. We pick the coolest moments in our lives and the selfies that look the best. We find the small things that match the life we want to personify, and that is what we chose to post. I watched a video a while ago that perfectly captured this concept. While browsing social media, a man was discouraged by the fulfilling lives he saw his friends living via their facebook posts. His life was falling apart around him. But when he decided to fabricate a more positive status update, he realized people responded more acceptingly. He presented only the best, so he could match up with those around him. 

But he, like most of us, failed to realize that that tactic goes both ways. Your friend who posts a new hiking picture every weekend may have gone on one hike last summer, and chosen to spread the photos out slowly. Your incredibly photogenic crush probably took twenty selfies before choosing to post the one you see on your feed. Nobody’s life is perfect, not even your perfect-looking friends on facebook. With the filters social media creates, we become blindsided by only our own flaws. We lose hope in the shadow of our mundane lives. Our self-assurance dwindles as we gawk at the empty status box, racking our brains for any moment of adventure that graced us that day. While on the other side of the computer our friends are doing the exact same thing.

But how can we fix this? Looking on the bright side of life is never a bad thing, but I hardly think that is what we are trying to do. Social media is not about convincing ourselves of our importance and success, but rather showing it off to others. We flaunt our victories for the whole world to see, while we still hide and hate our failures. This is a misguided tactic. I truly believe happiness is not about being right, but happiness is about accepting your wrongs. We will never be happy with ourselves if we are dependent on the approval of others. So, the way to fix this social media problem is to simply care less about it. It does not matter if everyone knows your successes, as long as you feel accomplished with yourself, or feel determined to improve next time. “Likes” can not replace the crucial aspect of self-confidence.  

Furthering problems with social media include how it has consumed all our time. The pressure to look good on social media has become a daily priority in many peoples lives, and too often in mine. Although most do not check their apps for more than a few minutes at a time, if we added up all the time spent on all the different sites, at all the different moments in the day, the numbers would not seem so small. But what is really the point of it? We are too caught up in updating to see the lack of value that such routines have. If I were to check instagram, then facebook, then pinterest, recheck instagram, then make one more stop to facebook--what do I have to show for it other than a wasted fifteen minutes? Fifteen minutes that could have been used to draw a picture, or meet with a friend, or start the english paper I have due the next day. . .

Whether I am just checking in or actually fabricating a post, the time is equally misspent. Through social media, we see a chance to recreate ourselves every hour. We focus on new ways to better ourselves without actually living our lives. We really must ask ourselves what the point is in updating a statue twenty times a day. Nothing but self-promotion; we are abusing our ability to show off. Social media is teaching us that self promotion is an important activity, and it has blinded us to the rest of the world. We are constantly fixated on our next selfie, and fail to think of more valuable things around us, the more valuable ways to spend our time. We should be focusing more on promoting the good in the world, but because we have created a life line leading to social media, we can only focus on ourselves. Because our confidence is constantly falling short, our time is wasted with trying to building it back up again on line.

Finally, social media has caused us to become reliant on others of the wrong reasons. We see their success and even when we mindlessly like their posts, on the inside, we are trying to hide the feelings of envy and self-doubt. We rely on our friends for complements rather than conversations, and it has lead many to depression and heartache. The like button was born of good intentions, but has been shaped into a tirent. It has cut out any need for conversation or interaction. Imagine if every time you met up with your friend you simply responded with a thumps-up, and then walked away. It is impolite and useless, but nonetheless we still thrive off its existence. Everything we post, every picture we take, everything we say, is only deemed worthy by the number of likes it gets. Our own ideas becomes useless to us if others will not except them. 

We fixate every moment we have to trying to appease the like button. We are constantly reshaping our opinions to match those of the popular point of view, regardless of what we actually knew about the issue before. Our only interaction with our “friends” comes from the desire for compliments. It’s not just in the virtual world where this occurs; as we become more dependent on social media for confidence, we are constantly looking towards those around us for praise as well. We “fish for compliments” and resort to insulting ourselves, just to get someone to contradict us. We check our instagram every two minutes to see if a new like popped up. Without these meaningless notions of acceptance, we fall into a trap of self-doubt, and convince ourselves the only thing to do is change ourselves. But that is not what needs to be changed. 

Hidden within the ever lengthening news feed of social media is the greatest threat to the self-esteem of our generation. Beyond the confines of the internet, each of us has the potential to be something great. But honestly, you should not have to take my word for this, I am just some random girl writing a paper that you are probably reading on a computer. We put too much faith in what the world is saying, or how the world will see us. I do this nearly every morning when doing my hair or picking an outfit. I look in the mirror not at myself, but at the person the world might rip apart. We spend too much energy calculating all of our moves to "win" in their eyes: be prettier, be funnier, get their attention, have cooler stuff, do cooler things, say something they will like, fit in - we treat ourselves as guilty until they prove otherwise. 

I cannot fix this problem for you. Turning to a news article for reassurance will only further the problem, and deepen the addiction. My only goal is to open your eyes to the different ways you are being manipulated by social media.  It is time to step away from the computer and disconnect for awhile. We need to see beyond the tricks of social media: the misguided claims to fame, the filters of the curator affect, and the demands of complements and acceptance. We need to venture into the world beyond the screen, and discover how incredible our lives can be. We need to fix the problem ourselves, for ourselves.

Monday, February 2, 2015

Reflection on the OP ED

What writing strategies worked for me?
Well, I started by outlining all my ideas in bullet points and that was really nice. It helped me recall my ideas at a glance. Instead of needing to come up with new ideas as I wrote, I was able to focus on connecting my existing ideas with the thesis.
Also, I think I did pretty well with connecting with the audience...at least, I think I did well, it up for you to decide when you read it. But, I put in a few personal experiences, and made sure I sounded like a friendly, non-condisending author - because those are the kind that always drive me away.

What writing strategies did not work for me?
Um, I think I struggled with making my point right away. I always tend to over explain things, just so I know my reader knows exactly why I think the way I do. I know that is important, but I aways seem to do it in twice as many words that what I actually needed. I am probably doing it right now, just so you can understand what I mean when I say I write too much. I have not finished the last two paragraphs on the OP ED yet, but it might end up being 6 pages . . .

What were my experiences writing this OP ED?
Honestly, I think I had a good experience writing this paper - as far as writing papers goings. I did not have to research anything, which is always a plus. But more importantly, I was able to express myself in my own words. The topic I picked ended up being a lot more substantial than I was originally intending, and it made it very fun to write about. Even after I finished the first draft and turned it in, when the reviewers told me to expand an idea, I was surprised to find out I did have more to say before moving onto the next idea. Granted, I had a bit too much to say, and hopefully everything that made it into the paper is still relevant to this thesis, and not some shoot-off idea.